Many horticultural
problems that can shorten the life of desert trees
begin when trees are transplanted or installed. Promoting a
dispersed root system is central to the successful establishment
and long term vigor of all desert plants. Tree rooting can be
influenced by planting methods, the quality and quantity of
viable roots at the time of transplanting and the
characteristics of the soil where the tree is being planted. As
discussed previously (Arid Zone Times 1-2-94), questions about
the size, shape and depth of the planting hole, the need for
organic amendments in the back fill and the value of
post-transplant pruning have long been debated by landscape
professionals. Traditional planting methods require a hole dug
slightly larger and deeper than the dimensions of the box size
being planted. This method does not guarantee effective rooting,
can expose the trunk to soil-borne diseases if the tree
sinks or settles lower than the soil line and can limit the
availability of oxygen in root zone. An alternative being
studied is to excavate a planting hole that with rough, uneven
sides and bottom, with the hole no deeper than the height of the
root-ball and 3 to 5 times as wide as the root ball. Recall that
the majority of active tree roots are found within the top
couple of feet of soil. The rough sides of the planting hole
foster a better interface between back-fill and existing soil
and improves lateral root development. This wider excavation
combined with loose incorporation of the native backfill soil
allows for quicker and broader water penetration making it
easier for new roots to grow and spread.
Numerous studies have
shown that back-fill used in transplanting desert trees
should not be amended with organic matter. Desert trees species
are well adapted to soils with little organic matter (generally
less than 1% by weight). Excess organic matter can slow water
penetration and encourage water-saturated soils that act to
suppress the development of new roots. Organic matter in the
backfill can also prevent roots from penetrating into
surrounding native soil. Where needed sand can be added to the
back-fill to increase water penetration in heavier soils. The
development of new roots is stimulated by and dependent upon the
growth of new leaves and stems. Pruning immediately following
planting reduces the trees ability to photosynthesize and only
serves to reduce new root, stem and leaf growth and can delay
tree establishment. Such pruning is considered unnecessary and
potentially detrimental. Prune only broken or damaged limbs.
Staking should be used sparingly and only for a short time.
Staking can provided wind stability for the trunk and root-ball
and help promote effective root establishment. Tree stakes must
be removed so trunks can develop proper caliper and taper.
Plant roots only
explore moist soils. The depth and distribution of
irrigation water will dictate the depth and distribution of
plant roots. A single, point source of water, like that
delivered by a drip emitter, produces a cone-shaped profile of
wet soil with the point of the cone (or smallest part of the
profile) being directly beneath the emitter. The distribution of
emitters then will dictate the distribution of water and
directly influence rooting. The design and installation of
traditional irrigation systems has favored economics over
horticultural considerations. It is obvious that as the tree
grows the irrigation system should be expanded to deliver water
over a larger area. Limited numbers of immovable emitters
produce a physically restricted root system and tends to keep
the soil near the trunk water saturated during and immediately
following irrigations. These two conditions can make trees more
prone to wind throw.
Ways to limit the risk
of wind throw of established trees include: drier soil
adjacent to the trunk (as the tree matures); pruning 20% of
stems and leaves per tree trimming and appropriate staking and
timely stake removal. Juan Barba, a Tucson area Certified
Arborist, has proposed alternative designs for tree irrigation
systems that better accommodate tree and root growth. One method
is to install concentric rings (see diagram) of emitters that
extend out to the drip line of the tree. Such an arrangement
would distribute water over a much larger area and result in a
more highly dispersed root system. A second alternative would be
to arrange numerous emitters to an X pattern (see diagram)
rather than the rings. Both options increase the initial cost of
installation but could pay long term dividends as trees mature.
Not all planting locations can accommodate some of the
alternative planting methods discussed. Nor are all these
methods currently cost effective. Desert adapted plants and arid
landscape designs present new and unique challenges to
conventional horticultural methods. Landscape professionals
should play a role in addressing these challenges, be willing to
experiment and remain receptive to innovative alternatives.