This is the third in our
series on issues related to pruning of arid landscape trees. As
has already been covered (AZTimes 2:6, 1995 & 3:11, 1996) the
primary goals of tree pruning are to compliment the natural
shape of the tree and to promote healthy, vigorous growth.
Pruning can have a number of effects on trees. It can compensate
for root loss, aid in maintaining health and appearance, control
plant size, influence vigor and re-invigorate stagnant trees.
Two things should always be appreciated when pruning: 1)
improper pruning can serve to stimulate additional unwanted
growth; and 2) each pruning cut creates a wound in the tree
bark. Proper and selective cuts will enhance the appearance and
health of trees and leave wounds that will heal rapidly. The
angle and position of pruning cuts greatly influences the
overall success of a pruning program and dictate how quickly
wounds will "heal". Pruning cuts should be made close to, but
not beyond, the branch bark ridge and the collar at the base of
the branch (see diagrams 1).
Sharp tools that make
clean, smooth edged wounds will heal the quickest. These wounds
don't "heal" like animal wounds. Instead trees produce callus
tissue that essentially "re-cover" the area. Wounds heal from
the edges. This is easily seen by observing the ring of raised
or swollen bark surrounding the edges of the wound. The bark
tissue forms the callus, giving the edges of the cut this raised
appearance. Over time, with growth and the subsequent increase
in the branch diameter, the old wound is closed completely. Dull
pruners and saws leave ragged edged cuts. Such cuts develop
callus more slowly delaying the healing process. Wounds that are
slow to heal can be sources of oozing sap (that can stain
hardscape elements and patio furniture) and serve as points of
entry for insects, bacteria and fungi. These pest can cause
additional damage and further delay healing.
Another common mistake is
leaving short stumps instead of pruning branches off just above
the collar. Aside from being extremely unsightly (and
unprofessional looking) these stubs can sunburn, dry out, cause
die back and serve as entry sites for some wood boring insects,
bacteria and fungi. Tree borer damage is often misidentified as
being caused by tree stress or general decline when in fact it
is the result of stub pruning. Secondly stubs can snag clothing
or the skin of pedestrians. Most importantly, such cuts generate
additional unwanted branches by stimulating both lateral and
adventitious buds (bud arising from previously woody tissue) to
produce numerous new branches. This proliferations of branches
must ultimately be removed by additional pruning.
Removing the branch at the
collar serves to direct the subsequent growth towards the
terminal of the remaining branch without excessively stimulating
other buds to produce additional branches. Similarly, when
heading back a branch, pruning back to a lateral bud seems to
direct the branch growth through that bud making it the new
terminal bud (see diagram 2 center (B) image for correct cut
angle).